raversofbrc - [everyone] Second Night |
| Link:7437 Sat Jan 23 00:21:53 2010 |
| Time:2005-09-20 21:56:34 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#74765 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#3 #5 #14 #21 #46 #56 #68 #72 #73 #80 #84 #93 #103 #104 #105 Children:#2 |
#1 | |
| Interesting, very Interesting. Who had it out for | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 22:08:47 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#75789 | Parent:#1 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#2 | |
| well obviously I did, but how's that different from the last game . . . * | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 22:35:29 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#77069 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #5 #14 #21 #46 #56 #68 #72 #73 #80 #84 #93 #103 #104 #105 Children:#4 |
#3 | |
| I feel so bad for | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 22:45:39 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#77581 | Parent:#3 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#4 | |
| Time:2005-09-20 22:47:51 GMT Author: Subject:EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#77837 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #14 #21 #46 #56 #68 #72 #73 #80 #84 #93 #103 #104 #105 Children:#6 #7 |
#5 | |
| So, here's the one claim game we get from the Glowstick Ninja... Do the Claim Game, don't be Lame! A) B) C) Of these, any guesses as to whom the Dear Departed would have looked at first? | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 22:52:05 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#78093 | Parent:#5 Siblings:#7 Children:#8 #11 |
#6 | |
| It's a little obvious for him, but I'm going to Vote Down with the mayor!!! | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 22:53:32 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#78349 | Parent:#5 Siblings:#6 Children:#9 #13 |
#7 | |
| I suspect all three of them. Given that he actually fingers | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 22:55:14 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#78605 | Parent:#6 Siblings:#11 Children:#22 |
#8 | |
| oh please give me a break . . . 1- any one of those claims could be false 2- the chances of 3- I didn't want to vote for evil ben and only did to save our "known" villager 4- and yes it is way too obvious for me, give me some damn credit . . . I'm being set up 5- the narcs obviously saw that 6- thus they arrested | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 22:56:35 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#78861 | Parent:#7 Siblings:#13 Children:#10 |
#9 | |
| yea well who was it that started the vote | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:06:50 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#79117 | Parent:#9 Siblings:(none) Children:#12 |
#10 | |
| How did I start the Your vote was on | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:06:56 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#79373 | Parent:#6 Siblings:#8 Children:#24 |
#11 | |
| I would also like to point out: 1- that a Glowstick Ninja playing the claim game has to pick someone to list as uncool even if they didn't spy any uncool people the night before because otherwise we'd always lose the person on day 1 as they'd have all cool claims and would be obviously the ninja . . . 2- 3- | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:14:22 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#79629 | Parent:#10 Siblings:(none) Children:#25 |
#12 | |
| I didn't change at the last second like yea and how is voting for me the right action? given our sketchy knowledge, little chance of give me some credit, if I were a narc, I never would have arrested | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:16:00 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#79885 | Parent:#7 Siblings:#9 Children:#15 |
#13 | |
| vote (skip off to go dance) | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:23:19 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#80397 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #21 #46 #56 #68 #72 #73 #80 #84 #93 #103 #104 #105 Children:#16 #18 #50 |
#14 | |
| Ya know, if I were the Glowstick Ninja, the first two players I would have looked at this game would have been It's not about hunting for NARCs, it's about knowing what roles two really strong/key players from the Lupus game were assigned. The Mayor (who brought along the pyro vote | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:24:17 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#80653 | Parent:#13 Siblings:(none) Children:#17 |
#15 | |
| in the modified words of | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:24:49 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#80909 | Parent:#14 Siblings:#18 #50 Children:#19 |
#16 | |
| Ruined it?! That was awesome! | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:25:55 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#81165 | Parent:#15 Siblings:(none) Children:#20 |
#17 | |
| Cough up your identity then, before it's too late, Mayor McCheese! | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:26:31 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#81421 | Parent:#14 Siblings:#16 #50 Children:(none) |
#18 | |
| I'm a plain old raver . . . just a plain old raver . . . well at least too my knowledge . . . which leads me to believe that I might possibly be a frat boy if and | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:27:18 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#81677 | Parent:#16 Siblings:(none) Children:#27 |
#19 | |
| if you don't change your vote I'm going to give the | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:29:07 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#81933 | Parent:#17 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#20 | |
| well sadly I'm just a Raver . . . which is why I know none of you will believe me . . . but recall that there are 5 Ravers in the game and two others who believe they are simply ravers for a total of 7 out of 17 (now 15) so almost half of us here believe we are just ravers . . . Raver . . . only a Raver . . . although if I were a drama queen I'd take | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:34:44 GMT Author: Subject:Dilemma Link:7437#82445 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #14 #46 #56 #68 #72 #73 #80 #84 #93 #103 #104 #105 Children:#23 #26 #29 #34 |
#21 | |
| Is the Mayor actually a Frat Boy? Is the Mayor a Narc claiming to be the Frat Boy? Did It's very possible he did check me, because I (to the best of my knowledge) am a basic RAVER. What about you, ilovetequilla? | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:45:09 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#82701 | Parent:#8 Siblings:(none) Children:#28 |
#22 | |
| the chances of Totally false reasoning (and let's not forget how many games we've had where the seer *did* choose a wolf on night 0). The seer chose someone and there were 4/17 odds that person would appear to be a wolf. That does not affect the odds of any of the three statements being what he saw. The only thing we really know to determine which it is is which of the three of us | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:45:18 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#82957 | Parent:#21 Siblings:#26 #29 #34 Children:#36 |
#23 | |
| Plus, on multiple choice stuff, people choose "b". | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:47:52 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#83213 | Parent:#11 Siblings:(none) Children:#31 |
#24 | |
| #1: How do you figure that?? The claim game doesn't require everyone to claim one narc each day, that doesn't make any sense. I did not claim any narcs on day 1 and yet I am not the ninja. | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:48:23 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#83469 | Parent:#12 Siblings:(none) Children:#38 |
#25 | |
| You ask: yea and how is voting for me the right action? I don't have any other info to go on? Your claim as a raver does make it possible that you're the frat boy, but I can only go by confidence levels and probability here. Option A - you're a narc: you voted for Option B - you're a raver: you were not targeted by Ostracizing you gets us: Option A: a narc Option B: the slightly increased confidence level in ilovetequilla and Ostracizing someone else: Um, I don't see anyone else being more likely than you right now. One night closer to doom... | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:51:54 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#83725 | Parent:#21 Siblings:#23 #29 #34 Children:#30 |
#26 | |
| The Glowstick Ninja can't tell if you're some special other than narc. Why would you imply that he could? | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:54:24 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#83981 | Parent:#19 Siblings:(none) Children:#32 |
#27 | |
| And now threats?! Where's the love baby, where's the love?! Here, have a "candy." | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:55:40 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#84237 | Parent:#22 Siblings:(none) Children:#37 |
#28 | |
| let's face it with all three of our pasts he could have looked at any one of the three of us . . . | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:55:50 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#84493 | Parent:#21 Siblings:#23 #26 #34 Children:(none) |
#29 | |
| Yep, I am a raver. | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:57:35 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#84749 | Parent:#26 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#30 | |
| If the Glowstick Ninja looks at you, and you're a Frat Boy, you look like a Narc even though you're a Raver. The Mayor is claiming that he may (unwittingly) be the Frat Boy and that the Glowstick Ninja checked | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:57:41 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#85005 | Parent:#24 Siblings:(none) Children:#39 |
#31 | |
| nope, but the rules do state that you should pick in percentages of narcs left over . . . if the glowstick ninja never gets a narc, what's he suppose to do, pick all cool claims . . . I'd bet the ninja wouldn't last long . . . he's suppose to keep one set of claims true which means he could have false claims of narcs in his other claims . . . | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:58:47 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#85261 | Parent:#27 Siblings:(none) Children:#33 |
#32 | |
| oh sure drink my wine, eat my candy, and then vote for me . . . thanks . . . I might ask you where's the love? | |||
| Time:2005-09-20 23:59:28 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#85517 | Parent:#32 Siblings:(none) Children:#35 |
#33 | |
| Obviously the love was with someone else... | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:01:29 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#85773 | Parent:#21 Siblings:#23 #26 #29 Children:#40 #51 |
#34 | |
| how about this: 1- we don't lynch me tonight (and if the drama queen bites it, I'll understand if they drama me out of existence) 2- I pick someone (since it's now impossible to pick the glowstick ninja you don't have to worry there) 3- if I'm completely off base, which I wasn't last turn on | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:02:06 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#86029 | Parent:#33 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#35 | |
| no more wine for you . . . | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:02:32 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#86285 | Parent:#23 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#36 | |
| actually I usually go c, but that's just me :) | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:03:01 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#86541 | Parent:#28 Siblings:(none) Children:#41 |
#37 | |
| Yep, I think that's true. Which basically means that at this point we don't know anything about his claims. But I guess we know now that there is a 1/3 chance that you are either a narc or a frat boy. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:03:58 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#86797 | Parent:#25 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#38 | |
| ostracizing me gets you exactly what the narcs want: one of the people who was highly responsible for all the wolves bitin' it last game off the playa . . . | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:04:33 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#87053 | Parent:#31 Siblings:(none) Children:#43 |
#39 | |
| When the percentage is less than 1/3, then some of the claim sets should not contain a narc. Picking one narc every time makes everyone more likely to be outed to the narcs as either the ninja or not. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:04:35 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#87309 | Parent:#34 Siblings:#51 Children:#42 #44 |
#40 | |
| I'm down. We'll likely lynch you tomorrow anyway. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:04:54 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#87565 | Parent:#37 Siblings:(none) Children:#45 |
#41 | |
| yep basically . . . which considering how many people are left in the game is probably about what I already had :) | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:05:29 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#87821 | Parent:#40 Siblings:#44 Children:(none) |
#42 | |
| ok thanks . . . | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:08:32 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#88077 | Parent:#39 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#43 | |
| personally i'm not so sure the claim game is a good thing . . . as last game a wolf tried to use it to find the seer and almost succeeded . . . also last game I almost thought a wolf was a seer because of the number of correct claims they had . . . it's broken, but so far I haven't been able to think of a better way for the seer, ninja, etc to get their point across . . . | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:11:46 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#88333 | Parent:#40 Siblings:#42 Children:(none) |
#44 | |
| so you going to unvote me now? | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:12:40 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#88589 | Parent:#41 Siblings:(none) Children:#47 #64 |
#45 | |
| Yeah, without the claims, it's 4/15, which is a tiny bit lower, but really this isn't much higher! :) I guess we could say that now there is a 1/3 * 3/4 = 3/12 = 1/4 chance that you are a narc. Only slightly worse than the 3/15 = 1/5 that everyone else has! :) | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:15:56 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#88845 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #14 #21 #56 #68 #72 #73 #80 #84 #93 #103 #104 #105 Children:#48 |
#46 | |
| Wow man! This is all too hairy. If only there were enough e for us all... then life could be cuddly lovely all the time. (Well, except the cracked out days afterwards and the anxious waiting for the next time around.) If only there were something with a little less edge and a little more love... I wanna new [love potion]... we'll see how #9 does. Though so far, I'm a little disappointed. I'm afraid that at this point I can't bring myself to vote for My Mayor himself. No other obvious candidates so far. And I left the top off of the Barbie Dream Jeep during today's surprise cloudburst! Now I've got wet and playa to deal with during our eventual departure. I VOTE | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:17:55 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#89101 | Parent:#45 Siblings:#64 Children:(none) |
#47 | |
| it's been so long since I had any probability or statistics classes, I'll take your word :) | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:19:58 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#89357 | Parent:#46 Siblings:(none) Children:#49 |
#48 | |
| I got a guest room in the RV, it's dry and occasionally air conditioned . . . | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:37:25 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#89869 | Parent:#48 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#49 | |
| I'll ride that wagon! I gotta go slack in a chill room for a couple of hours and think about all of this without the blaring beat bruising my brain. Can't think, the beat will eat me! | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 00:40:02 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#90125 | Parent:#14 Siblings:#16 #18 Children:#67 |
#50 | |
| you know the first day you claimed to be a simple villager last game, i believed you and moved onto | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 01:40:32 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#90381 | Parent:#34 Siblings:#40 Children:#52 #53 |
#51 | |
| Are you going to pick someone? For now I'm going to have to vote | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 01:42:18 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#90637 | Parent:#51 Siblings:#53 Children:#58 |
#52 | |
| shit, thanks, keep the bandwagon rolling . . . big help you are . . . if I had to pick anyone with the info I have right now, I'd go with | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 01:45:47 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#90893 | Parent:#51 Siblings:#52 Children:#54 |
#53 | |
| sure, after we're already down the ninja, lynch the guy who found the wolves last game especially when he has really no better chance of being a narc than anyone else . . . I hope all your asses get arrested after you lynch me . . . | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 01:56:48 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#91149 | Parent:#53 Siblings:(none) Children:#55 |
#54 | |
| Alright, I'll give you a chance. Unvote Vote | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 02:00:41 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#91405 | Parent:#54 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#55 | |
| Thanks, here have a beer :) . . . or would you rather have vodka . . . All I'm asking is one day (not that my chances are the best, but I did vote for a wolf on day 2, 3 and 4 last game) so who knows maybe I'll get lucky again and we can have a narc free playa at the end like last game . . . | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 02:22:36 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#91661 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #14 #21 #46 #68 #72 #73 #80 #84 #93 #103 #104 #105 Children:#57 #60 #71 |
#56 | |
| right now it looks like a battle between the so i've picked someone at random. vote | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 02:35:42 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#91917 | Parent:#56 Siblings:#60 #71 Children:(none) |
#57 | |
| well hey, at least it's not a vote for me like everyone else . . . so thanks :) | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 02:44:39 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#92173 | Parent:#52 Siblings:(none) Children:#59 #62 |
#58 | |
| Care to share your reasons? I for one am not going to simply blindly vote for whomever you say. I had a vague gut suspicion of you at one point yesterday, though I really just can't see you arresting | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 02:56:39 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#92429 | Parent:#58 Siblings:#62 Children:#81 |
#59 | |
| I really think the narcs saw sadly I don't have many reasons to lynch now I'd gauge my gut feelings last game to be about 50% right . . . so flip a coin I guess :) . . . care for a beer, glass of wine, Evil Ben Snack? no, don't put your hand too close to the | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 02:59:12 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#92685 | Parent:#56 Siblings:#57 #71 Children:#61 #65 |
#60 | |
| Hey, I can understand the whole voting at random thing. I, however, know something that you don't know. I am not left handed (nor am I a Narc). I wish I had someone better to point you to. I think that I'm going to vote vrelis based on what paraneze said yesterday. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 02:59:51 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#92941 | Parent:#60 Siblings:#65 Children:#70 |
#61 | |
| what did I say yesterday about vrelis? | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 03:09:25 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#93197 | Parent:#58 Siblings:#59 Children:#63 |
#62 | |
| oh you want to test my theory . . . the only way to really test it is have a whole bunch of votes rack up for him and see if he claims special or raver (and even then it doesn't prove anything) . . . however, I bet he won't claim special (at least undisputed) . . . | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 03:30:22 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#93453 | Parent:#62 Siblings:(none) Children:#66 |
#63 | |
| what the hell... I can always change my vote before dawn. vote vrelis | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 03:34:09 GMT Author: Subject:Re: EvilBen's Legacy.... Link:7437#93709 | Parent:#45 Siblings:#47 Children:(none) |
#64 | |
| You've missed a step. In any arguement about ferreting out the RAVERS from the NARCS, each RAVER knows that they are a RAVER, and really for purposes of our swaying arguments, the voting decisions of the NARCS don't affect that statistic. Everybody gets to decrement by one. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 03:34:48 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#93965 | Parent:#60 Siblings:#61 Children:(none) |
#65 | |
| if we get some evidece i'll be happy to vote for someone else. However, rather than | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 03:35:16 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#94221 | Parent:#63 Siblings:(none) Children:#69 |
#66 | |
| And assuming anybody presents some actual claims this round that might be used as evidence I fully expect I'll change my vote. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 03:39:27 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#94477 | Parent:#50 Siblings:(none) Children:#76 |
#67 | |
| BTW, next time we go back to Miller's Hollow - especially considering the conclusion of the last game with the werebaby - we should play | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 05:17:03 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#94733 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #14 #21 #46 #56 #72 #73 #80 #84 #93 #103 #104 #105 Children:(none) |
#68 | |
| *sniff* *sniff* I smell barbecue. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 05:27:46 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#94989 | Parent:#66 Siblings:(none) Children:#74 |
#69 | |
| Actually | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 06:18:41 GMT Author: Subject:Opps... Link:7437#95245 | Parent:#61 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#70 | |
| My bad. It was And then he voted for vrelis. (edited to try and fool the counter) | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 06:19:47 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#95501 | Parent:#56 Siblings:#57 #60 Children:(none) |
#71 | |
| Yeah, both have shown themselves in the pas t to be rather valuable ravers. They've also both shown themselves to be very good at getting people to follow them, which will be very bad if one of them is a narc and we don't get rid of him. I'd prefer to not lynch either of them without better evidence, but also need to make sure no one is blindly following either of them. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 07:21:35 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#95757 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #14 #21 #46 #56 #68 #73 #80 #84 #93 #103 #104 #105 Children:#95 #102 |
#72 | |
| Hmmm, a lot of people haven't been back to camp yet tonight. lj user="vrelis"/> Where are you guys? Did you get lost after that cool explosion in the blinky light forest? | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 07:54:37 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#96013 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #14 #21 #46 #56 #68 #72 #80 #84 #93 #103 #104 #105 Children:#75 #86 |
#73 | |
| Barring any better targets, I'm going to Vote I don't really have much of a reason, just feels like he's hiding something, trying to blend. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 10:33:17 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#96269 | Parent:#69 Siblings:(none) Children:#77 |
#74 | |
| Ok. I'll say it. That said, I don't wanna lynch him yet. It's early in the game. We still have very little useful evidence about any of the players. Same for the NARCS. And it'll cost us a lot more to mistakenly kill off our ally here than to let our enemy live. But there is something floating out there that hasn't gotten talked about - our K9UNIT and her comments from last night. Huh. Look at that. I wonder if she was trying to tell the NARCS something. Could all just be noise. She was on the side of the NARCS, had to find a way to communicate that to them (she didn't know them, they didn't know her, but she knew that they knew who each other were and by extension who the RAVERS are), and took an immediately hostile position toward [Imagine for a moment though the dangerous position we might be in if the three NARCS are he, We've managed right off the bat to take down the most expensive player to lose this early. Playing without a seer this early is going to hurt us later on as we all know. And even now - racing to the end point is going to be a costly run. Bear with me as I think out loud a little bit... Self-outing claims can't reliably be made this early. Two NARCS can support each other as HIGH SCHOOL CHUMS for example. But being one of multiple parties in a contested claim buys you even odds of getting nailed as a NARC fast. If we make the SPECIALS obvious to them, then they get to zero in on our CHEMIST or try and find the SNITCH both of which they get to do slightly faster than we do (since they already know who all three of them ARE and we don't). At least there's no reason to question any RAVER claims as a turned SNITCH yet. Assuming that everyone did out themselves and it went uncontested, we'd be down to 10 players three of whom are NARCS. And they'd be down to seven unknowns, one of whom is their SNITCH. Do they hunt for the SNITCH or try and maneuver the DRAMA QUEEN into taking another RAVER down with her? The CHEMIST gets a free save, outed or not so that wouldn't especially hurt us. But overall I still think it's giving too much information to the NARCS for too little payback this round. They have 10 unidentified villagers, and are trying to find out the SNITCH while not getting blowed up by bad timing with the DRAMA QUEEN or the CHEMIST (both of whom get more dangerous to the NARCS the longer they live). We RAVERS have got 3 NARCS among the 14 of us. -- You're pretty high up on my list right now too though. And entirely undefended. But if I change my vote to you this late in the evening, I'll lose any dogpiling on vrelis my last (but previous) vote might churn up. OTOH, it might get us some dogpiling on you that'd be good to see how everybody reacts to. And as much as I'm loathe to admit, again - I'm just a fanboy for Mr. Mayor. He's totally got the game mechanics down and is playing a winning strategy (both last game and so far for either side this game). And he still sees things in the board that I'm not putting together as quickly. I'll post again in the morning a couple of hours before the lynching. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 15:35:53 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#96525 | Parent:#73 Siblings:#86 Children:#94 |
#75 | |
| I really have nothing to go on in regards to h & h. So far (and even with his refusing to change his vote away from But thanks for not voting for me :) | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 15:41:49 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#96781 | Parent:#67 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#76 | |
| actually the next game at Millers Hollow will be two werewolves and two mafia | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 16:00:55 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#97293 | Parent:#74 Siblings:(none) Children:#78 |
#77 | |
| well I might point out that today, | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 16:10:57 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#97549 | Parent:#77 Siblings:(none) Children:#79 |
#78 | |
| True, but that correlation only sticks for the first round. It's meaningless after that. Now, that he's pushing hard (the only aggressive voice this round) against a potentially very expensive mistake. That makes him suspect. My only new suspect this round. I'll update my vote as soon as I can review the current posts. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 16:15:53 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#97805 | Parent:#78 Siblings:(none) Children:#83 |
#79 | |
| ok, I'm slightly confused . . . you're saying that the person who was second in the votes yesterday is a narc? and that usually the person who was second in the votes is a narc? | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:03:12 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#98061 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #14 #21 #46 #56 #68 #72 #73 #84 #93 #103 #104 #105 Children:(none) |
#80 | |
| You know you people amaze me . . . 178 comments yesterday, but when I'm in danger of being lynched no one shows up to save me and it only generates 79 comments. Thank you very much to everyone currently falling fall And really, what have you got to lose. It's not like I can convince you to lynch the ninja as we already did that. Worse case, we get the chemist, and I'm sure I mean come on here, it's not like I'm asking you to pick between me and a potential glowstick ninja. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:11:04 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#98317 | Parent:#59 Siblings:(none) Children:#82 |
#81 | |
| Due to the Glow Stick Ninja's claims and your lack of any good reason to lynch | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:14:45 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#98573 | Parent:#81 Siblings:(none) Children:#85 |
#82 | |
| wow, how nice for being topsy turvy there saying you were down with letting me proove myself and then changing your mind . . . thanks for nothing . . . for christ's sake, it's day two, you have nothing to lose (not even the ninja) for giving me one chance to prove myself . . . and after my track record last game a whole lot to lose . . . | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:16:02 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#98829 | Parent:#79 Siblings:(none) Children:#87 |
#83 | |
| While stabbing around in excel watching saturday morning cartoons with the cat last weekend I observed what looked like a very strong correlation. It was that when examing first round data, players that were voted for only 2-3 times were most often voted for by at least one wolf. (This is not 100%, btw!) For example, in the recent This puts Reruninng my grid after the final round one votes (sorry folks, I didn't expect to live through yesterday, and my memory was based on a morning run of the votes tally) yields candidate suspects: Hrmnnnn.... I don't think I heard any claim from vrelis to not feed 'im to the NARCS. Or for that matter from Hard to sort anything out of that mess. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:19:12 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#99085 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #14 #21 #46 #56 #68 #72 #73 #80 #93 #103 #104 #105 Children:(none) |
#84 | |
Look here for my reply: http://www.livejournal.com/users/ I still this it's too expensive a mistake if we wrongly kill unvote vrelis vote No, there's not solid evidence supporting him as a NARC, but we're way short on evidence and he's suspicious and offered no defense. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:19:45 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#99341 | Parent:#82 Siblings:(none) Children:#88 |
#85 | |
| Alright, I guess I'm down with that. You're instincts have been pretty good. vote | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:21:23 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#99597 | Parent:#73 Siblings:#75 Children:#97 |
#86 | |
| A vote at this time for | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:23:02 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#99853 | Parent:#83 Siblings:(none) Children:#91 |
#87 | |
| I think that's because Narcs often just let the village take someone out on their own the first day while trying to not be responsible for the person who gets it . . . interesting theory . . . sadly I can't add any evidence to your list as vrelis and right now, my gut is telling me it's | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:27:01 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#100109 | Parent:#85 Siblings:(none) Children:#89 |
#88 | |
| thank you, well I figure I have a 50/50 chance being right and thus surviving tomorrow if I don't get lynched today :) here have a beer, try the candy . . . want an Evil Ben snack, Extra Crispy flavor? | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:29:10 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#100365 | Parent:#88 Siblings:(none) Children:#90 |
#89 | |
| MMMmmmm...I think | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:30:52 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#100621 | Parent:#89 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#90 | |
| Time:2005-09-21 17:32:44 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#100877 | Parent:#87 Siblings:(none) Children:#92 |
#91 | |
| Aleady ahead of you: http://www.livejournal.com/users/ | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:34:05 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#101133 | Parent:#91 Siblings:(none) Children:#100 |
#92 | |
| thanks :) | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:38:38 GMT Author: Subject:Catching up... Link:7437#101389 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #14 #21 #46 #56 #68 #72 #73 #80 #84 #103 #104 #105 Children:#96 |
#93 | |
| All righty then. unvote vote | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:39:17 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#101645 | Parent:#75 Siblings:(none) Children:#98 |
#94 | |
| That may be, I don't really know him. Seems like he's been a lot more vocal in previous games, though. Frankly, Mr. Mayor, if you're a raver I'd hate to see you go so soon, but if you're a narc I'd really like to see you go soon. :) | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:39:44 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#101901 | Parent:#72 Siblings:#102 Children:(none) |
#95 | |
| Heh... "playatime" and "playabrain" have clearly set in... | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:40:45 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Catching up... Link:7437#102157 | Parent:#93 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#96 | |
| thanks . . . :) | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:41:29 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#102413 | Parent:#86 Siblings:(none) Children:#99 |
#97 | |
| I didn't make that vote at "this time", I made it quite some time ago. I am now considering whether to change my vote or let it stand. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:43:33 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#102669 | Parent:#94 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#98 | |
| I understand that one . . . I'd agree on the same thing for you :) . . . although from a moderator point of view it was awesome watching you be a wolf last time :) | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:49:37 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#102925 | Parent:#97 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#99 | |
| Alright, since it's down to a vote between Vote | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:50:16 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#103181 | Parent:#92 Siblings:(none) Children:#101 |
#100 | |
| Mister Mayor, it would appear that the tide has turned in your favor. God help us all. Magic word. Everybody drink some water. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:53:12 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Dilemma Link:7437#103437 | Parent:#100 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#101 | |
| actually god help me if I'm wrong, you guys will surely lynch me tomorrow :) come to think of it, god help if I'm right too, the narcs will surely arrest me now if I am so basically I got maybe a day left max :) oh well, it was a fun game while it lasted . . . | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:55:29 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#103693 | Parent:#72 Siblings:#95 Children:(none) |
#102 | |
| I wanted to get back, but as I was wandering through the burning landscape, I had this vision. a terrible, scary vision of Office supplies, and a meeting..... and arrrrgggggghhhh *collapses and twitches* | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 17:58:35 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#103949 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #14 #21 #46 #56 #68 #72 #73 #80 #84 #93 #104 #105 Children:(none) |
#103 | |
| if I get arrested tonight my list of suspects is as follows: HIGH: vrelis, MIDDLE: amphtrite27, LOW: | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 18:00:45 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#104205 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #14 #21 #46 #56 #68 #72 #73 #80 #84 #93 #103 #105 Children:(none) |
#104 | |
| Post closed | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 18:06:10 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:7437#104461 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #14 #21 #46 #56 #68 #72 #73 #80 #84 #93 #103 #104 Children:(none) |
#105 | |
| Sorry for coming into the game so late, since I missed most of the discussion, I don't want to cast a last minute vote and ruin the numbers.... so vote Stupid meetings of boring doom. a lot of the traffic occurs at night and in the morning, so if I have a meeting in the morning its hard for me to eb on top of things. But this should be the only such day this week. Oh and if its not clear yet, this time, I am totally a small perky tiny female raver. Sooo innocent and tiny. I'm a plurry little raver, look at my outfit! | |||
| vote | 2005-09-20 22:52:05 GMT | #6 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-20 22:53:32 GMT | #7 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-20 22:56:35 GMT | #9 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-20 23:16:00 GMT | #13 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-20 23:23:19 GMT | #14 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-21 00:15:56 GMT | #46 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-21 01:40:32 GMT | #51 | |||
| unvote | 2005-09-21 01:56:48 GMT | #54 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-21 01:56:48 GMT | #54 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-21 02:22:36 GMT | #56 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-21 07:54:37 GMT | #73 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-21 17:19:12 GMT | #84 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-21 17:19:45 GMT | #85 | |||
| unvote | 2005-09-21 17:38:38 GMT | #93 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-21 17:38:38 GMT | #93 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-21 17:49:37 GMT | #99 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-21 18:06:10 GMT | #105 |
| 6 against | : | ||
| 2 against | : | ||
| 1 against | : | ||
| 1 against | : | ||
| Posted but no vote | : | ||
| posts by | : | (45) | #2 #4 #8 #9 #11 #12 #15 #18 #19 #20 #28 #31 #32 #34 #35 #36 #38 #41 #42 #43 #44 #47 #48 #50 #52 #53 #55 #57 #59 #61 #62 #75 #76 #77 #79 #80 #82 #87 #88 #90 #92 #96 #98 #101 #103 | |
| posts by | : | (13) | #22 #24 #29 #37 #39 #45 #58 #71 #72 #73 #94 #97 #99 | |
| posts by | : | (12) | #46 #49 #63 #64 #66 #74 #78 #83 #84 #86 #91 #100 | |
| posts by | : | (10) | #13 #16 #17 #21 #23 #30 #40 #81 #85 #89 | |
| posts by | : | (5) | #7 #10 #25 #26 #69 | |
| posts by | : | (4) | #1 #6 #27 #33 | |
| posts by | : | (4) | #5 #14 #93 #95 | |
| posts by | : | (4) | #3 #56 #65 #67 | |
| posts by | : | (2) | #60 #70 | |
| posts by | : | (2) | #102 #105 | |
| posts by | : | (2) | #51 #54 | |
| posts by | : | (1) | #104 | |
| posts by | : | (1) | #68 |