raversofbrc - [everyone] Third Night |
| Link:9132 Sat Jan 23 00:21:54 2010 |
| Time:2005-09-21 21:11:36 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#112556 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:#2 #14 |
#1 | |
| Hot damn. And I was ready to give Do the NARCs not have any telephathy with each other at all?! I mean, they don't know who they are either? | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:14:18 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#112812 | Parent:#1 Siblings:#14 Children:#4 |
#2 | |
| The NARCs know who the other NARCs are. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:15:03 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#113068 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:#6 #10 |
#3 | |
| Okay - I'll start the discussion... what the hell does that mean... How did the NARCS gang up and arrest Or can we interpret this as a "no-kill" by the NARCS, but a poising by the CHEMIST. /me wanders off to re-re-read all of the character descriptions and special properties. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:15:15 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#113324 | Parent:#2 Siblings:(none) Children:#9 |
#4 | |
| I guess I need to check that juice I just drank. Can someone explain (in small words for my addled brain) what just happened?! | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:16:14 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#113580 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:#7 |
#5 | |
| so this is a crazy game so far. the K9 and two NARCs are gone. Leaving one original NARC and the SNITCH who was probably turned last night. right? | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:16:43 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#114092 | Parent:#3 Siblings:#10 Children:(none) |
#6 | |
| i think it was the chemist..... | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:18:43 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#114604 | Parent:#5 Siblings:(none) Children:#8 #15 #20 |
#7 | |
| and remember that just because | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:20:14 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#115116 | Parent:#7 Siblings:#15 #20 Children:#11 |
#8 | |
| plus the SNITCH was tuned, still leaving us with two, one of whom, if ninja'd would have showed raver. but still not bad for a bunch of hippies | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:20:56 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#115372 | Parent:#4 Siblings:(none) Children:#22 |
#9 | |
| In captain dummy talk, I agree with the later speculation, the NARCS grabbed the SNITCH, and the CHEMIST popped The only other interpretation I can imagine is that | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:23:24 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#116140 | Parent:#3 Siblings:#6 Children:#12 |
#10 | |
| This didn't look like a poisoning, but I can't fit my head around how, with only two Narcs, one of them can vote to arrest the other one. I think they need a majority to arrest, which means a unanimity with only two Narcs. Oh great neon Man! Won't you give us a sign?! (bow and prostrate) | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:24:09 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#116908 | Parent:#8 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#11 | |
| I'm really not that hip-py. I keep trying, bet the damn things are still pretty much straight up and down. ;-) | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:28:42 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#117676 | Parent:#10 Siblings:(none) Children:#17 |
#12 | |
| The | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:43:08 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#120748 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:#23 #27 #29 |
#13 | |
| Reviewing the facts of last day: One Narc got offed by sunset. There was only two Narcs remaining at the beginning of the day. Therefore: It could've only been the super-potion of the Chemist that wound up getting Therefore: The Narcs didn't directly arrest anyone last day. They found the Snitch OR they couldn't decide who to bust. I think that them not compromising on someone to bust is bloody unlikely, although possibly due to the obvious Narc infighting going on. I think it's much more likely that one of us has turned Snitch. Which means, two more Narcs to go. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:45:15 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#121516 | Parent:#1 Siblings:#2 Children:(none) |
#14 | |
| Yeah, me too. That was pretty tricky of the Mayor. The Chemist has kicked some major ass by seeing through that ruse. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:48:23 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#121772 | Parent:#7 Siblings:#8 #20 Children:(none) |
#15 | |
| I (unfortunately) think it was | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:52:05 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#122540 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:#21 #24 #25 |
#16 | |
| I think we've found the noisy Narcs. I think one of the remaining Narcs is a quiet one. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:53:21 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#122796 | Parent:#12 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#17 | |
| Thank you, Man! May you live forever! | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 21:55:01 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#123308 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:#30 #31 |
#18 | |
| the third, and most unlikely option of what transpired is that wait, i don't know if thats true...(wouldn't the chemist have seen that he was targeted by the NARCS and then not have poisoned him?) the chemist could also have drugged | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:11:17 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#124844 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:#69 |
#19 | |
| The post numbers are : Night 1 vrelis made 2 posts - low, busy, NARC? Night 2 vrelis 0 posts - suspicious | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:11:23 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#125100 | Parent:#7 Siblings:#8 #15 Children:(none) |
#20 | |
| I actually did not claim to be a plain old raver, I just claimed to be a raver (as in not a narc). Joel did claim to be a plain old raver. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:16:24 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#125356 | Parent:#16 Siblings:#24 #25 Children:(none) |
#21 | |
| also last night he said "right now it looks like a battle between the [info] so i've picked someone at random. vote [info] so he may be trying to avoid voting for any NARC vote | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:16:32 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#125868 | Parent:#9 Siblings:(none) Children:#41 #44 |
#22 | |
| Hrm. If the chemist popped Just like in the werewolves game, we can tell the difference between death by wolf attack and death by witch's poison, we should be able to tell the difference between someone being arrested and being slipped the chemist's psychadelic. GM: is this correct? If someone gets slipped the long acting psycadelic, will we know it or will they appear to be arrested? | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:18:44 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#126380 | Parent:#13 Siblings:#27 #29 Children:#40 |
#23 | |
| But it just doesn't make sense. A hit by the chemist should not be the same as an arrest just like a poisoning by a witch is not the same as a werewolf attack. We should be able to see the difference. I'm not seeing any possible way for these events to have transpired. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:19:08 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#126892 | Parent:#16 Siblings:#21 #25 Children:#26 |
#24 | |
| My uncharacteristically mild posting is a result of the fact that classes start this Thursday. Therefore, we've had several activities going on at church - I've spent at least 4 hours a day there monday, yesterday, and today - and i've been working 8-5 monday and tuesday and 8-1 today because i work on campus, and these are the days we have our annual training session. i usually check from work, but i've been unable to do so because i actually had stuff to do at work these last few days, and church has chewed up my remaining time. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:20:22 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#127148 | Parent:#16 Siblings:#21 #24 Children:(none) |
#25 | |
| I agree with your agreement with me. ;-) Vote But I need to go back and look at what characters we have and everything that happened to see how this whole thing is possible. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:22:33 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#127660 | Parent:#24 Siblings:(none) Children:#34 |
#26 | |
| any words on why you defended both NARCS yesterday....or any other suggestions? | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:23:27 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#127916 | Parent:#13 Siblings:#23 #29 Children:(none) |
#27 | |
| or the chemist both offed and saved someone, assuming thats possible | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:25:13 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#128428 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:#33 #36 #37 #47 |
#28 | |
| Things we know. We have removed from play the following roles: ( ( ( ( The DOSE FAIRY (me) could not affect the outcome of that round. The HIGH SCHOOL CHUMS (2) could not affect the outocme of that round. The FRAT BOY could not affect the outcome of that round. [Also, the FRAT BOY has not been entirely deactivated and for the rest of the game can be considered just another of the original RAVERS - as there are not remaining NINJA claims to wrongly see him.] The RAVERS (all 5 still with us! We should call them 6 from now on.) could not affect the outcome of that round. I imagine that since only one person was taken out that the DRAMA QUEEN was not activated, but somehow survived while taking out their target. Anybody else think this is possible? (NARCS pick DRAMA QUEEN, DRAMA QUEEN was pointed at Leaving us with significant players "yesterday": 2 Original NARCS CHEMIST SNITCH NARCS attack Chemist is told that - Chemist Defends - how did - Chemist ignores - - Chemist attacks - why would they do that? That makes No sense at all!! NARCS attack ! - Chemist Defends - how was - Chemist ignores - how did - Chemist Attacks - Yup - that seems the only sane interpretation; that the SNITCH was targeted by the NARCS and has been activated and then the CHEMIST had it out for and nuked Other theories: 1) The NARCS pick up the DRAMA QUEEN. The DRAMA QUEEN fingers 2) The NARCS pick up | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:25:51 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#128684 | Parent:#13 Siblings:#23 #27 Children:(none) |
#29 | |
| or as i mention below, the chemist and the NARCS target him, and he's the snitch he becomes a NARC, only to get arrested. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:26:20 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#128940 | Parent:#18 Siblings:#31 Children:#32 |
#30 | |
| CHEMIST can't use both potions in the same night. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:27:05 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#129196 | Parent:#18 Siblings:#30 Children:#35 |
#31 | |
| wait, i don't know if thats true...(wouldn't the chemist have seen that he was targeted by the NARCS and then not have poisoned him?) It's all simultaneous, I believe. The Chemist can dose the same person the Narcs bust. Only one of the Chemist's two potions may be used on any given day. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:30:13 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#129452 | Parent:#30 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#32 | |
| thanks | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:30:25 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#129708 | Parent:#28 Siblings:#36 #37 #47 Children:(none) |
#33 | |
| quoting myself The FRAT BOY has been entirely deactivated. Sorry for the type-o. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:31:22 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#129964 | Parent:#26 Siblings:(none) Children:#54 |
#34 | |
| i think my post stands as a valid point - | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:31:36 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#130476 | Parent:#31 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#35 | |
| so if it is done simultaneously, the chemist easily could have drugged I almost find that more likely than him starting the vote against it would make sense for the NARCS to take him out early. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:32:00 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#130732 | Parent:#28 Siblings:#33 #37 #47 Children:(none) |
#36 | |
| And under Other Theroies 1) - Shouldn't be applicable. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:33:07 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#131244 | Parent:#28 Siblings:#33 #36 #47 Children:#39 |
#37 | |
| I imagine that since only one person was taken out that the DRAMA QUEEN was not activated If the Drama Queen is busted, she is revealed as the Drama Queen. The Drama Queen is still among us. If | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:36:11 GMT Author: Subject:requesting clarification from the gm Link:9132#132012 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:#43 #46 |
#38 | |
| 1) In this setting is a player being removed from the game via CHEMIST potion indistinguishable from a NARC pick-up? 2) In this setting, is it possible for the DRAMA QUEEN to be activated (killed) take out their target, and then be saved - thus resulting only in the removal of the DRAMA QUEEN's target but not the DRAMA QUEEN? | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:38:19 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#132524 | Parent:#37 Siblings:(none) Children:#42 |
#39 | |
| I'm inclined to agree with you, but the GM's language seems to conflict with several players expectations re: a CHEMIST killing. If that is the likely possibility, why is the saved after activated DRAMA QUEEN interpretation not also valid? Liberties with notifications seem a required feature of the current outcome. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:39:50 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#132780 | Parent:#23 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#40 | |
| I guess the "what info you reveal" chart is different and unknown for | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:40:12 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#133036 | Parent:#22 Siblings:#44 Children:#49 #50 #51 |
#41 | |
| well, the only reason we can tell hte difference in wolf/witch attackes is the flavor text, which we are technically not supposed to use. i don't remember ever seeing a descriptor of "the witch killed the wolf blahblah blah" | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:46:07 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#133292 | Parent:#39 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#42 | |
| The only required information that the moderator gives is who is "dead" and what role they had (at the current time, in the case of the Snitch). Giving reasons why someone "died" (poison, arrested by Narcs, eaten by the Werebunny) is completely up to the moderator's discretion and is not covered by the Master Rules. There is a blind version of the game where roles are not revealed at the death of that character, but we are not playing that version. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:49:00 GMT Author: Subject:Re: requesting clarification from the gm Link:9132#133548 | Parent:#38 Siblings:#46 Children:(none) |
#43 | |
| 2) As a moderator, I would rule the Drama Queen isn't dead in this case, and therefore gets no retalitory strike. I'm not sure what the rules are here. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:50:44 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#133804 | Parent:#22 Siblings:#41 Children:(none) |
#44 | |
I think I'd have had much more fun writing flavor text if the Mayor of Miller's Hollow had been hopped up on the long lasting psychedelic when he was arrested. =) | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:57:05 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#134060 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:#48 |
#45 | |
not drugged, just arrested so, there is no snitch (the two NARCS taregted | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:57:13 GMT Author: Subject:Re: requesting clarification from the gm Link:9132#134316 | Parent:#38 Siblings:#43 Children:(none) |
#46 | |
| 1) Would I pass up such a sweet opportunity for writing flavor text that had the Mayor hopped up on some long lasting psychedelic? The long lasting psychedelic potion would not look like a normal arrest. 2) The DRAMA QUEEN only gets their free kill when they actually die. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 22:58:12 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#134572 | Parent:#28 Siblings:#33 #36 #37 Children:(none) |
#47 | |
| see the brc post, regular plain old no chemist involved arrested | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 23:05:04 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#134828 | Parent:#45 Siblings:(none) Children:#53 |
#48 | |
| But wouldn't he have had half of the votes?! Why would he ever vote for himself? | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 23:10:31 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#135084 | Parent:#41 Siblings:#50 #51 Children:(none) |
#49 | |
| No, we are told the difference. When someone is dead, we are told whether they were killed by wolves or poisoned by the witch. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 23:13:27 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#135340 | Parent:#41 Siblings:#49 #51 Children:(none) |
#50 | |
| Heh, I started to second guess myself, but then | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 23:16:57 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#135852 | Parent:#41 Siblings:#49 #50 Children:(none) |
#51 | |
| Okay, I started to second guess myself because I can't find a case in | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 23:19:55 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#136108 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:#71 |
#52 | |
| The Man has raised his hands and spoken. So then, what's the explaination that makes any sense? There's no MARTYR in this game. Have we mis-interpreted a sly and subtle role definition that permits some false report? Was there a second kill attempt the first day that the CHEMIST saved? | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 23:22:40 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#136364 | Parent:#48 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#53 | |
| I dunno, but so he must have agreed...or been outvoted, could we have missed something? | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 23:24:10 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#136620 | Parent:#34 Siblings:(none) Children:#65 |
#54 | |
| wrll i can be swayed by further discussion...i understand about the havoc of school. and it may just be unlucky that you were defending teh only two known NARCS | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 23:24:31 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#136876 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:#57 |
#55 | |
| Alright! SO I believe we now know: * The snitch did not turn (there would have been no arrests). * The chemist did not dose anyone (there would be someone out due to being dosed!) * The drama queen did not take anyone out (this only happens if the drama queen is herself actually taken out - if she's saved, no one goes out). Therefore * * There is now one narc left in the game, and one snitch who could turn if the narc tries to arrest him. * I believe | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 23:25:39 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#137132 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:#59 |
#56 | |
| Also interesting, our two known NARCS ( No evidence from their deaths of candidate fellow NARCS or likely safe RAVERS. Damn. Even in death. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 23:27:36 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#137388 | Parent:#55 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#57 | |
| Nice! A reasonable explaination for how | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 23:30:48 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#137644 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:(none) |
#58 | |
| If there's only one NARC left, then the HIGH SCHOOL CHUMS can identify each other - but I wouldn't do it until one of you started getting dogpiled on. | |||
| Time:2005-09-21 23:43:07 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#137900 | Parent:#56 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#59 | |
| Damn. On the positive side, the narcs have damn near cleaned themselves out! If we do nothing at all, maybe the last narc will kill himself. ;-) | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 00:05:48 GMT Author: Subject:*whimper* Link:9132#138156 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:(none) |
#60 | |
| Are we sure the DOSE FAIRY didn't just hit the communal water supply? :-) Makes my head hurt... gonna go hang out in the shade structure and pet Slow Down! | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 00:05:49 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#138412 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:(none) |
#61 | |
| I'm going home sick *sniffle sniffle* Sorry I can' stay guys. I'll be gone for a few days and won't be able to play. Luck to all. ::walks off into the desert sunset:: | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 00:12:10 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#138668 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:#63 |
#62 | |
| Crap on a stick. Last night we saw no votes or | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 00:13:11 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#138924 | Parent:#62 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#63 | |
| and | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 00:40:58 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#139180 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:(none) |
#64 | |
| A recommendation for the rest of the game, right now (still counting I imagine for the rest of the game that the lone NARC will be trying to find their SNITCH. Right now, they've got 1/11 to hunt for. If we fully reduce the number (outing all the specials) it falls to 1/6. And the DRAMA QUEEN can still be used against us anyway. But by just blind random chance their 1/11 or 1/6 is still better than our collective 1/12 or 1/5 and the gap grows as our numbers dwindle. So - we've got to find a way to (while not outing ourselves) hunt down the NARC from among the seven "plain" RAVERS, from the 11 people left that aren't me. Sadly, those of you that've made claims to be plain RAVERS are the targets for both sides now. more later. and sadly, the Adam's rockin' game interface page has been down for a while now, so reading back up into the comments threads here is gonna be a pain. | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 01:21:31 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#139436 | Parent:#54 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#65 | |
| Best option at the moment. Vote | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 02:19:03 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#139692 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:#67 #73 |
#66 | |
| Busy night tonight, so I'm not sure that I'll get back to getting into a more organized writing of my thoughts here, but this I think needs spelled out, so here goes. All special characters, DO NOT OUT YOURSELVES... let me explain. DRAMA QUEEN - if you out yourself you become a target for the NARC as they know you'll take someone down with you. Keep your drama bomb targeted at random villagers. If you think you've identified the CHUMs or the CHEMIST, go ahead and avoid them. If we have a highly likely second choice for lynching, you might choose them that night. LOVERS - same above - if you out yourself you become a target for the NARC going for the two-for-one kill. HIGH SCHOOL CHUMS - your anonymity protects the DRAMA QUEEN and the CHEMIST. CHEMIST - You are the key to identifying the activated SNITCH. Do not save anybody (including me, excluding yourself, you're no use to us dead). As long as you haven't saved anyone you get visibility into who the SNITCH is once activated. Very powerful. I'm not sure what to do yet once a SNITCH has been activated, not how to defend yourself should you be the target of a lynching. Any help here someone. MORE FROM ME ON THIS LATER IF I GET A CHANCE TO THINK WRITE OUT ALL THE REASONS. EVERYBODY - the three players left in the game that are of special value to the last NARC are the SNITCH (who will increase the number of NARCS), the CHEMIST (who can both identify the SNITCH once activated and kill at will in the day), and the DRAMA QUEEN who will has that two-for-one kill value. The LOVERS also fit that bill, but not knowing how they overlap (if at all) the other roles, they can really be ignored here. The last NARC at this point is likely to be optimizing for detecting these roles. That's it for my first pass. Think on it, comment on the holes I've left here or am blatently failing on. | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 04:48:03 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#140716 | Parent:#66 Siblings:#73 Children:(none) |
#67 | |
| I agree about the chemist. Don't kill or save anyone but yourself - none of the rest of us are important at this point. When you see someone targeted and not killed, just kill them the next day. No need to even reveal yourself. | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 04:57:45 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#141228 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:(none) |
#68 | |
| Well, it's 4 votes for me and none for anyone else, so it looks bad for my chances. I'll just reiterate what i've said before - I've been having training sessions at work Monday-Wednesday, my classes are starting tomorrow, and my duties for the church council keep me very busy. Since this is Welcome Week for freshmen, I've spent many hours a day at church working on the welcome activities we do, which eats up my free time after work. As for my defense of On the other hand, it won't bother me overmuch if you lynch me (or whatever we do here in BRC :P). I haven't had the time to get into this game like I have in the past, and it looks like we'll win soon anyway - i don't see how the NARCs could come back from such a blow. But there's always a chance, so please, don't lynch me. I give you my word i'm just a raver. Oh, and since i'll probably die anyway, here's my shameful secret - i hate raves <3 | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 11:35:27 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#142764 | Parent:#19 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#69 | |
| i've been traveling for work. Which shold make me suspicious, I suppose, considering it's burning man and all. But so it goes. | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 14:34:26 GMT Author: Subject:princeofwands abstains Link:9132#143020 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #72 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:(none) |
#70 | |
| With no good evidence, a dogpile already on vote If my vote is looking like a tiebreaker / decision maker, please reply to this comment and the email notification with this subject will get my attention and I'll see what I can do. Otherwise, good luck RAVERS! | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 15:07:27 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#143276 | Parent:#52 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#71 | |
| A second "kill" attempt is not possible unless it is the Chemist or Drama Queen. We know the kill-trip potion hasn't been used, nor has the Drama Queen been busted. There has been no second "kill". | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 15:42:26 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#143788 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #74 #78 #79 #81 Children:(none) |
#72 | |
| Vote | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 15:55:56 GMT Author: Subject:Rules Clarification Link:9132#144556 | Parent:#66 Siblings:#67 Children:#75 |
#73 | |
| um why would the chemist see anything about the snitch? . . . I don't know how Adam's doing it, but in Millers Hollow, the witch (chemist) sees who the victim is of the werewolves (narcs). In the case of the afflicted (snitch) there is no victim. That's all the witch (chemist) gets. There's no way I'd rat out the identity of the afflicted to the witch just because they hadn't used their healing potion. I'm assuming Adam will either refute me or back me up. | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 15:57:59 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#144812 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #78 #79 #81 Children:#77 |
#74 | |
| Vote I don't think that paranzanese would have put his fellow Narc in the "most suspicious" category. | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 16:18:43 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Rules Clarification Link:9132#145068 | Parent:#73 Siblings:(none) Children:#76 |
#75 | |
| If the SNITCH turns, the CHEMIST will not know who he is. If the CHEMIST has not yet used the detox potion, all they will know is that there was no arrest. | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 16:37:07 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Rules Clarification Link:9132#145580 | Parent:#75 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#76 | |
| Thank you Master Raver Man!!! My playa-brained self had latched onto the incorrect notion that the CHEMIST saw who the NARCS attacked rather than who they killed. Silly me. Boy has the playa been playing tricks with me this year. OMG!! What if I'm the last NARC? | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 16:45:53 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#145836 | Parent:#74 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#77 | |
| I know that there is very little I can say, except that I've been talking a lot of strategy, and that I am in fact NOT THE NARC it isn't that foolish to ostracize one villager, since we are so far ahead, but I think there is absolutely no proof of my guilt. And I think that there are far more suspcious characters than I. Also, | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 17:08:27 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#146348 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #79 #81 Children:(none) |
#78 | |
| vote Ooh, looky!! It's that bandwagon artcar again! SHINY! | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 17:14:21 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#146604 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #81 Children:#80 |
#79 | |
| I must apologize for my lack of posting. I have been on joory doody for the last two days. Apparently, Ravers tend to get excused. | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 17:17:29 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#146860 | Parent:#79 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#80 | |
| Oh yeah... vote I like wandbagons. | |||
| Time:2005-09-22 20:51:09 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:9132#149932 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #5 #13 #16 #18 #19 #28 #38 #45 #52 #55 #56 #58 #60 #61 #62 #64 #66 #68 #70 #72 #74 #78 #79 Children:(none) |
#81 | |
| Post closed | |||
| vote | 2005-09-21 21:52:05 GMT | #16 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-21 22:16:24 GMT | #21 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-21 22:20:22 GMT | #25 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-22 01:21:31 GMT | #65 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-22 14:34:26 GMT | #70 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-22 15:42:26 GMT | #72 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-22 15:57:59 GMT | #74 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-22 17:08:27 GMT | #78 | |||
| vote | 2005-09-22 17:17:29 GMT | #80 |
| 7 against | : | ||
| 1 against | : | ||
| 1 against | : | ||
| Posted but no vote | : | ||
| posts by | : | (18) | #3 #7 #9 #28 #30 #33 #36 #38 #39 #52 #56 #57 #58 #62 #64 #66 #70 #76 | |
| posts by | : | (18) | #5 #6 #8 #18 #19 #21 #26 #27 #29 #32 #35 #41 #45 #47 #53 #54 #63 #77 | |
| posts by | : | (12) | #10 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #31 #37 #40 #42 #43 #71 | |
| posts by | : | (9) | #20 #22 #23 #25 #49 #50 #51 #55 #59 | |
| posts by | : | (6) | #2 #12 #44 #46 #75 #81 | |
| posts by | : | (4) | #1 #4 #11 #72 | |
| posts by | : | (4) | #24 #34 #67 #68 | |
| posts by | : | (2) | #48 #74 | |
| posts by | : | (2) | #79 #80 | |
| posts by | : | (2) | #60 #78 | |
| posts by | : | (1) | #73 | |
| posts by | : | (1) | #61 | |
| posts by | : | (1) | #69 | |
| posts by | : | (1) | #65 |