millershollow - Day 4 |
| Link:144077 Sat Jan 23 00:17:48 2010 |
| Time:2007-07-19 18:47:46 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2132173 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:(none) |
#1 | |
| well I'm stumped. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 18:52:21 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2132685 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#10 |
#2 | |
| My quick vote yesterday was based on the fact that Clearly I was wrong. I thought I'd explain my logic before being thought suspicious. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 18:54:15 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2133197 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#5 |
#3 | |
| why | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 18:58:02 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2133709 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#6 #7 |
#4 | |
| Hm, | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 18:58:36 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2133965 | Parent:#3 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#5 | |
| Totally agree with you on the wtf. Just about everyone who was a seriously suspicious person has been eaten, lynched, or given a Sicilian neck-tiel; you'd think the wolves would want those people around to distract them. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:01:38 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2134477 | Parent:#4 Siblings:#7 Children:(none) |
#6 | |
| i'm not a wolf, | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:01:44 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2134733 | Parent:#4 Siblings:#6 Children:(none) |
#7 | |
| Well, | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:03:46 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2134989 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#9 #32 |
#8 | |
| Hell, I'll put myself out on the line. VOTE Almost everyone who's died thus far has pointed at him, and been a villager. It'd be rediculous to assume the wolves are killing people off to frame him, but I think I want to see if there's any credence there. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:07:58 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2135245 | Parent:#8 Siblings:#32 Children:(none) |
#9 | |
| That's worded poorly. Let me try again: I think that we have a few people (the dead villagers) who we know to not be trying to deceive us. Rusty's methods were very much against the spirit of the village, but maybe his hunches are right? This is of course not a final vote for the day, by any stretch. But it's as good a place to start as any, I think... | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:14:58 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2135501 | Parent:#2 Siblings:(none) Children:#35 |
#10 | |
| If he'd been the seer, he'd have stood up and told us what he knew before dying. Unless he was just being really surly by the end... Even though it wouldn't have been helpful, a few safe people in the village would have been a blessing. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:19:25 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2135757 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#14 #22 #31 |
#11 | |
| Man, it was painful watching that train wreck yesterday guys. That said, I think we have a decent amount of information, and it's time we start lynching the actual wolves. vote Because I'm pretty sure he is one of the vocal wolves, and when he's gone another will have to step up. Wolves rarely start a dogpile, they merely add to it. The second and third person to jump on were H&H and CC. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:20:11 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2136013 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#15 #19 |
#12 | |
| One other thing. I'd like to open up a vote on whether or not we want to have a sherriff again. At this point, we've hit a place where anyone who could kill of their own volition is gone, except the werewolves. Nomination would be tricky, but that's a hurdle to be taken after people take stock of this idea. But I think that the power of the vote is the only thing we've got to defend us against the werewolves, and that we can find someone equitable to take the position. Me, I won't accept nominations, should people even like my logic at all. But I'm sure we could find someone... | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:22:51 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2136269 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#25 |
#13 | |
| Current status: DEAD Still left: 4 Wolves 1 Magistrate 1 Seer 1 Wizard 1 (?) Afflicted 8 villagers (- 1 for afflicted, maybe) | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:24:37 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2136525 | Parent:#11 Siblings:#22 #31 Children:(none) |
#14 | |
| I'm not a wolf. And you can't blame me for my willingness to lynch | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:25:43 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2136781 | Parent:#12 Siblings:#19 Children:#16 #17 |
#15 | |
| without anyone we're sure is a villager around yet, it's too risky. And with no witch, I'm guessing the sheriff gets eaten on his/her first night. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:29:37 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2137037 | Parent:#15 Siblings:#17 Children:#18 #38 |
#16 | |
| Same reason why the SEER shouldn't come out. This is where the bodyguard would have come in very handy. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:29:42 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2137293 | Parent:#15 Siblings:#16 Children:(none) |
#17 | |
| Well, I suppose that's true. But it might be worth it. It'd be more information. It's hard to get people to willing take a little extra power in exchange for wearing a target. But there are plenty of mind games where it can work out. That's what I find most fascinating about this game. Every step of logic can always be countered with "But what if they expected that..." Eventually, we have to take risks, or the wolves will simply out-think us, because they have more information to start with. In disagreement with Rusty, I'm of the opinion that everyone here playing is intelligent. And while I'll agree that makes the wolves dangerous, if we get our act together, we can start working towards a little control. We need to find the first wolf. until then, it's all just straws... | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:36:25 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2137549 | Parent:#16 Siblings:#38 Children:#20 #23 #36 |
#18 | |
| I don't think that a sheriff has the same amount of kill-quotient as the seer. The Sheriff, while powerful, is replaceable. If the first one gets eaten, we get another. We still have that extra vote to kick around. A villager is getting eaten regardless. If we just raise one up a little higher, the wolves may eat them, and we simply do it again. Or, the wolves won't, to make them look suspicious. Or they won't, because we've chosen a wolf. I'm not suggesting it'd be a happy place to sit, but I'm suggesting a sheriff might be a nice advantage. And it could always be voted away later. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:40:03 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2137805 | Parent:#12 Siblings:#15 Children:(none) |
#19 | |
| I dunno, it was just a thought. I got more sleep last night than I usually do, so I'm a little energetic today. Don't mind me. I'm just excited. (and still jobless... need to work on that more... blast all this time...) | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:41:09 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2138061 | Parent:#18 Siblings:#23 #36 Children:#21 |
#20 | |
| but when Sheriff #1 gets eaten, who do we give the Sheriff too next? We'd quickly run out of certified villagers. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:44:45 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2138317 | Parent:#20 Siblings:(none) Children:#27 |
#21 | |
| We don't have certified villagers to begin with. We just have hunches. I wouldn't want the Seer to out themselves. They're really the only thing between the Wolves and us. We can refine who we think is trustworthy... and if we don't end up with anyone we can all agree on, we don't need to keep it. This isn't about a crazy plot to invoke ties always ::grin:: This is about offering up a tool that can be used if it's needed, or discarded if it becomes unnecessary. If people don't like it, it dies here. And I'm not much worse off for having suggested it. Unless I go the way of Rusty... but I'd rather live, thanks... | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:45:00 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2138573 | Parent:#11 Siblings:#14 #31 Children:(none) |
#22 | |
| First off, let me just say that I'm not a wolf. Squamous, yes, loathsome, oh yeah, but totally a villager. Secondly, I will admit, I was the third person to jump on him. My reasons that he was trying, multiple times, to get a tie and I didn't agree with his reasoning behind it. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:45:06 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2138829 | Parent:#18 Siblings:#20 #36 Children:(none) |
#23 | |
| I'd have to agree- I, as sheriff was quite easliy led by the wolves. So smart wolves can use the sheriff to their advantage, then off him/her if they become problematic. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:46:44 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2139085 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:(none) |
#24 | |
| Um... now what? Votes regarding | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:48:07 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2139341 | Parent:#13 Siblings:(none) Children:#26 |
#25 | |
| Ok. Apparently my lack of experience and my personal bias (I played an amazingly fun game as Sheriff at PolyCon25) are showing through, so I'll take the call for a vote off the table. If someone else thinks it's a good idea, you can be the ones to put it back. But for now, I'll just go vibrate in the corner, and poke buttons on the laptop. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:48:43 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2139597 | Parent:#25 Siblings:(none) Children:#34 |
#26 | |
| ack, meant that to be a top level post. Must be more careful... | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:48:58 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2139853 | Parent:#21 Siblings:(none) Children:#28 |
#27 | |
| I think a second vote for the villagers isn't quite necessary yet - we still outnumber the baddies by like, 13 to 5 or so - and too easy to elect a wolf and give them plenty of power in the endgame. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:50:46 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2140109 | Parent:#27 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#28 | |
| Already took the vote idea off the table. I thought it was a good idea. No need to beat a dead horse :D | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 19:54:37 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2140365 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#30 |
#29 | |
| Just for clarity's sake. Vote for sherriff has been taken off table. Yay toplevel posting. And the inability to delete mistakes :D Yay sugar-rushes, also. Orange juice is tasty... | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 20:00:10 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2140621 | Parent:#29 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#30 | |
| Oh, and as a side note: I'm going to leave the computer for a while, to go paint my room. i figure this is a better use of all of this energy than sitting here and being totally overly-verbose... I'll be back, and I think I'll apologize already for my exuberance today. Have fun all :D | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 20:09:11 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2141901 | Parent:#11 Siblings:#14 #22 Children:(none) |
#31 | |
| I've said it the last two turns and I'll say it again here: *fingers corssed* Vote If this doesn't get one I don't know what will. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 20:14:29 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2142157 | Parent:#8 Siblings:#9 Children:(none) |
#32 | |
| It'd be rediculous to assume the wolves are killing people off to frame him You say that because you're new. That happens all the time. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 20:22:23 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2142925 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#65 |
#33 | |
| H&H doesn't seem to be acting himself this time around. Similarly, neither does I still don't trust daedalus. I'm going back and rereading the last three day's posts. Maybe something will solidify. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 20:24:44 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2143181 | Parent:#26 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#34 | |
| No worries. The #1 difference about the two games is anything you type will be copy & pasted and used against you. The #2 difference is time in that you have time to change your gut reaction, which tends to give people plenty of chances to sway the vote. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 20:27:08 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2143437 | Parent:#10 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#35 | |
| Traditionally, a SEER up on the chopping block will eventually come out and reveal. The general pattern is to plead like there's no tomorrow when the tide against them becomes great. Sometimes they'll reveal in desperation, hoping that the witch will save them (of course we lost ours, so that doesn't apply). At the very least they should reveal in the last few minutes, to get their info out. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 20:28:55 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2143693 | Parent:#18 Siblings:#20 #23 Children:(none) |
#36 | |
| It was more of the comment that since we lost the witch, we lost a key ability to save the seer. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 20:31:08 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2143949 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#39 #45 #47 |
#37 | |
| I'm idealess. The only person I suspect is Now that I see No one else has triggered my MAP rule sensors, so I can't use that. I'm thinking | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 20:31:56 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2144205 | Parent:#16 Siblings:#18 Children:(none) |
#38 | |
| It's still a day or two early for the SEER to come out. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 20:34:46 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2144461 | Parent:#37 Siblings:#45 #47 Children:(none) |
#39 | |
| To be honest | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 20:46:13 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2145229 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#41 #42 #46 |
#40 | |
| vote with | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 20:47:30 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2145485 | Parent:#40 Siblings:#42 #46 Children:#43 |
#41 | |
| Interesting. He's not even been on my radar. Care to share your reasoning? | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 20:47:36 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2145741 | Parent:#40 Siblings:#41 #46 Children:#44 |
#42 | |
| Well I certainly hope so! Mind explaining why or is it just a "hunch"? | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 20:56:37 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2145997 | Parent:#41 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#43 | |
| Sorry- just a hunch. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 20:57:41 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2146253 | Parent:#42 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#44 | |
| I would if I could- you just popped into my head as I was rereading posts. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:02:19 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2146509 | Parent:#37 Siblings:#39 #47 Children:#49 |
#45 | |
| "MAP rule" ??? | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:04:18 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2146765 | Parent:#40 Siblings:#41 #42 Children:#48 #60 #64 |
#46 | |
| In the past I've been more mathematical. I don't think that works here. I'm trusting my feelings more this time around. And I agree with you. vote Like I said, no real reason I can explain, just a feeling. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:04:22 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2147021 | Parent:#37 Siblings:#39 #45 Children:(none) |
#47 | |
| Next time, when I say, "Shhhhh!" you'll know I mean it :-) | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:05:00 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2147277 | Parent:#46 Siblings:#60 #64 Children:#51 |
#48 | |
| vote Someone convince me otherwise. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:07:12 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2147789 | Parent:#45 Siblings:(none) Children:#52 |
#49 | |
| Most Annoying Player. voting someone lynched so you no longer have to listen to them. Came up with that several games ago. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:09:57 GMT Author: Subject:Bad random thought. Link:144077#2148045 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#66 |
#50 | |
| What if the Seer was the lover of a Wolf? The village would be FUBAR. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:10:25 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2148301 | Parent:#48 Siblings:(none) Children:#55 |
#51 | |
| I find this turn of events perplexing. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:13:10 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2148557 | Parent:#49 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#52 | |
| Right, thanks. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:14:31 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2148813 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#54 #56 #61 #62 |
#53 | |
| I'll probly die for this (either by lynch or wolf kill, but They all just jummped on | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:16:22 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2149069 | Parent:#53 Siblings:#56 #61 #62 Children:(none) |
#54 | |
| I'm actually inclined to agree with you. After thinking about yesterday I'm hesitating on voting to see if I could find any particularly interesting patterns. That certainly seems to be one. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:17:57 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2149325 | Parent:#51 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#55 | |
| Me too, sounds like I am the designated victim this round scapegoat. I should start composing my dying wish for you all to ignore. ;) Since no logic is being used I find it hard to defend myself other then to say I have not voted for any of the people you have so far lynched, who by the way have all been villagers, like myself. All I can do is stand behind my voting record so far. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:26:57 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2149581 | Parent:#53 Siblings:#54 #61 #62 Children:(none) |
#56 | |
| I never thought I'd say this, but thanks I can really see no reason or logic behind this sudden attack either. unvote Holding my vote till I figure which one of the three is most worthy or most likely to get lynched! | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:29:21 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2149837 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#67 |
#57 | |
| Apparently I am the designated victim/scapegoat this round. I should start composing my dying wish for you all to ignore. ;) Since no logic is being used I find it hard to defend myself other then to say I have not voted for any of the people you have so far lynched, who by the way have all been villagers like myself. All I can do is stand behind my voting record so far. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:31:13 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2150093 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#59 |
#58 | |
| Grr @ my crappy connection that keeps making me lose my comments. Ok, I agree, with the exception of Chessie. I suspected her early on, but something happened in the voting that changed my mind. I'll need to go back and look at it, though. The speed with which the other two jumped on the bandwagon is suspicious. I'd figure at least one of them to be a furry, fanged beastie. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:33:20 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2150349 | Parent:#58 Siblings:(none) Children:#68 |
#59 | |
| This was supposed to be in response to Stupid toobs. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:33:49 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2150605 | Parent:#46 Siblings:#48 #64 Children:#63 #86 |
#60 | |
| Don't think mathematics is working? Trusting your feelings? Who are you, and what have you done with our resident statistician? Vote Can pod people be wolves, too? | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:33:59 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2150861 | Parent:#53 Siblings:#54 #56 #62 Children:#98 #113 |
#61 | |
| Because, you know, it makes perfect sense for three wolves to gang up on someone, one after the other in rapid succession like that, and wouldn't look suspicious at all. Only three completely idiotic wolves would ever vote like that during a lynching. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:38:28 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2151117 | Parent:#53 Siblings:#54 #56 #61 Children:#71 #75 |
#62 | |
| Well, that's enough to convince me a dead person's hunch isn't worth sticking to. I UNVOTE | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:42:29 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2151373 | Parent:#60 Siblings:#86 Children:#70 |
#63 | |
| Now, I'm not going to tell you to not trust your knowledge of people. But I am going to ask you why you think that makes him suspicious, mainly because I haven't played in previous games with him. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:42:48 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2151629 | Parent:#46 Siblings:#48 #60 Children:(none) |
#64 | |
| i'm not going to vote for you (yet, anyway), but THAT'S the most suspicious post i've seen all game :P | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:43:50 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2151885 | Parent:#33 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#65 | |
| you mean today i'm not acting like myself, or this game in general? Either way, how so? | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:44:36 GMT Author: Subject:Re: Bad random thought. Link:144077#2152141 | Parent:#50 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#66 | |
| lawlerz, that would suck so bad. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:46:10 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2152397 | Parent:#57 Siblings:(none) Children:#76 |
#67 | |
| Now you know how it feels, Mr. Claim Game :P Srsly tho, aside from your constant accusations of me I have no reason to think you're a wolf, so I'll hold off until someone makes a good argument. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:47:24 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2152653 | Parent:#59 Siblings:(none) Children:#72 |
#68 | |
| So of those three do you have a hunch? I am thinking the Kitty is most wolf like, pointy ears, furry bodies, tail, claws, fangs.... (joke) | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:49:11 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2152909 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#73 #80 #88 |
#69 | |
| I find it very interesting that two people jumped so quickly when I voted for Are they wolves jumping on the bandwagon with the goal to get me lynched when unvote This will probably be seen as an attempt to draw suspicion off of me as the instigator of a "dogpile". It's not. But don't you think we got some tasty tidbits from my vote? vote hungry&hollow | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:51:19 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2153165 | Parent:#63 Siblings:(none) Children:#74 |
#70 | |
| From the games that I can remember playing with him, He compiles in-depth voting histories across all days. He then takes that data and constructs complex statistical analyses, which he has occasionally (i.e. when he's been a wolf) "tweaked" in order to encourage voting for specific individuals. I believe he was even the one to come up with the claim game, and then created a utility to monitor people's claims to better identify the seer. In other words, I think the robot we know and love has been killed and replaced by an alien pod-person/werewolf hybrid on a mission to exterminate humanity. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:51:34 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2153421 | Parent:#62 Siblings:#75 Children:(none) |
#71 | |
| ::blink:: I think I might have been hasty in this. I'm going to stick with my gut for the moment, but am concerned I may have made the wrong call... | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:51:44 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2153677 | Parent:#68 Siblings:(none) Children:#81 |
#72 | |
| My, what a big mouth I have! | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:52:47 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2153933 | Parent:#69 Siblings:#80 #88 Children:#77 |
#73 | |
| I think they're just used to you voting for me with no real evidence. I know I am. :) I concede, however, that it is curious. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:53:26 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2154189 | Parent:#70 Siblings:(none) Children:#79 |
#74 | |
| Well, I can understand that, but this approach may not have worked in the past. From what I can see, he's internally consistant this game. I'm more worried about you, and your taunting of those who you're voting for... | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:55:19 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2154445 | Parent:#62 Siblings:#71 Children:#78 |
#75 | |
| I don't think I have, as far as voting goes. I made long posts regarding the serial killer and the tie vote stupidity, but as far as voting goes, I've been doing so on gut reaction, which I've listed as the reason each time. Gut reaction is a hard sell in this game. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:55:39 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2154701 | Parent:#67 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#76 | |
| At least I am consistent, you'll be happy to know I have "unvoted" you. So even if I die this round and then I am proven a villager, my dying "wish" won't be aimed your way. ;) Vote I don't know why she sank her claws in me, but a villagers got to defend himself. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:57:06 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2154957 | Parent:#73 Siblings:(none) Children:#82 |
#77 | |
| You make such a tricksy wolfie. :) | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:57:16 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2155213 | Parent:#75 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#78 | |
| Yeah, I've noticed. I think I was attributing more to you than you said, looking back. But, for the moment, this is where MY gut is telling me to be. Though I'm getting a weird vibe off Daedelus, too... | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:57:40 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2155469 | Parent:#74 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#79 | |
| Actually, his methods have historically worked very well for whichever side he happens to be on at the time. The problem I tend to have with them is that it makes the whole thing an exercise in number-crunching as opposed to, you know, a game. I've always thought that the paranoia and random finger-pointing is what makes the game fun. As for the taunting... Well, I just finished my thesis two days ago and am *this* close to *finally* graduating with my Master's degree. I think the giddiness may be spilling over into my comments. :) | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:58:49 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2155725 | Parent:#69 Siblings:#73 #88 Children:#90 |
#80 | |
| I'm curious then, why you didn't vote for one of the two suspicious folks who jumped on the bandwagon, and instead voted for H&H... Curious, indeed. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 21:59:30 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2155981 | Parent:#72 Siblings:(none) Children:#84 |
#81 | |
| And such big eyes to find this comment so fast. ;) | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 22:00:30 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2156237 | Parent:#77 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#82 | |
| Yeah, I did. :) Came *so* close to a lovers' win... But no, I'm no furball this time. Nice try, wolf! :P | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 22:01:20 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2156493 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#87 |
#83 | |
| I really don't see a shred of evidence against me (unless you count | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 22:01:36 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2156749 | Parent:#81 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#84 | |
| Nope- merely incredibly bored at work. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 22:02:46 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2157005 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#92 |
#85 | |
| I am completely confused, so I was being used as a stalking horse to see what other people would do? unvote Someone please give me a reasonable, logical target to vote for? | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 22:03:02 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2157261 | Parent:#60 Siblings:#63 Children:(none) |
#86 | |
| *sigh* I think you misread my post. The complex relational algebra doesn't work. The simple stuff still does, but it's really not all that useful. For example... Someone has put me and two others on the "suspicious" list because we randomly voted the same way. In a field of 17 players, 4 of which are wolves, there are 17C3=680 ways too choose three of them. Of those 680 ways, 13C3=286 ways will NOT involve any wolves. Which means that right now, if you take any random group of three, there is a 286/680 == 42% chance that NONE of them are wolves. This corresponds to a whopping 58% chance that one of the three of us is a wolf. Yippeee. Whoopdie doo. Better than even chance one of us is a wolf! Quick, everybody vote to lynch one of us! The problem is that that's true regardless of which three you choose! Knowing those numbers is useless. In the past I tried to come up with complex relational algebra claims to pull some signal out of that kind of noise, and I never got differences of more than a few percent. And worse, when I tried to show my ideas to people I get accused of being a wolf. Now I go the other way, and I get accused of being a wolf. Like I said earlier, I can't seem to win. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 22:04:21 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2157517 | Parent:#83 Siblings:(none) Children:#95 |
#87 | |
| You think you were picked on, I was just used as wolf bait! | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 22:05:52 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2157773 | Parent:#69 Siblings:#73 #80 Children:#89 |
#88 | |
| clarity once more. Collector missed it cause of the & | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 22:13:35 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2158029 | Parent:#88 Siblings:(none) Children:#91 #99 |
#89 | |
| Egads. What a horrific edge case. I'd pull my hair out trying to get the spell checker to acknowldege that. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 22:13:48 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2158285 | Parent:#80 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#90 | |
| Because it seems too obvious? I'm thinking of changing again- I have nothing concrete to go on. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 22:14:30 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2158541 | Parent:#89 Siblings:#99 Children:(none) |
#91 | |
| Not calling for you to fix it. Asking her to repost. You're doing a fantastic job with the site. Thanks muchly :D | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 22:15:50 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2158797 | Parent:#85 Siblings:(none) Children:#94 |
#92 | |
| No comment. *whistles innocently* | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 22:17:21 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2159053 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:(none) |
#93 | |
| I am leaving to pick up a friend from the airport. I will try my darndest to check in and re-asses my vote before the lynching. Have fun all! Glad I stirred things up a bit, even if I didn't mean to! | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 22:21:10 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2159565 | Parent:#92 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#94 | |
| Well at least you released the bait before it got ate. ;) | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 22:47:16 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2160077 | Parent:#87 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#95 | |
| LOL, your icon really makes that post a 10/10. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 22:50:50 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2160333 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:(none) |
#96 | |
| i'm so confused. But I'm going to go with - she's voting for me - she started a dogpile, then immediately switched votes when attention was drawn to the dogpile - i have no idea who else to vote for | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 22:52:51 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2160589 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#108 #112 |
#97 | |
| oops, forgot to say vote I'm also very suspicious of | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 23:33:41 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2161101 | Parent:#61 Siblings:#113 Children:(none) |
#98 | |
| Right, and we all would assume this, and we know none of you are idiots. this makes a good cover. It's a "wine in front of me" argument, but worth looking at. you'd probly make the same observation from outside. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 23:35:15 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2161357 | Parent:#89 Siblings:#91 Children:#100 #101 |
#99 | |
| Is it counting "Unvotes" properly? Currently I should not have a vote against anyone? | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 23:49:27 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2161613 | Parent:#99 Siblings:#101 Children:#102 |
#100 | |
| Both chessie and yourself unvoted, but it's not moved your name from the counter, and it seems not to until you vote again. You could fix it by | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 23:53:35 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2161869 | Parent:#99 Siblings:#100 Children:#103 |
#101 | |
| I've posted about this before, and nobody really got it, and it really doesn't matter much anyway, so I just sort of stopped reminding people and forgot about it. The vote counter doesn't really look at unvotes at all, except to note that they occurred. In other words, if you do a vote in one post and a vote in a second post without an intervening unvote, that's ok. The vote in the second post is what gets counted. A minor side effect of all that is if you vote and then unvote but don't vote again or If the transient miscount bugs you, just I believe that at this point Joe is aware of the problems with the automated counter and takes them into account, as he did at the end of Day 2 where he voided a vote that came in after the deadline. I'll poke more at fixing this sometime if it really bothers people. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 23:58:50 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2162125 | Parent:#100 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#102 | |
| Thanks, got it. | |||
| Time:2007-07-19 23:59:45 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2162381 | Parent:#101 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#103 | |
| Gotcha, don't bother fixing it, just didn't understand the logic chain. Vote | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 00:58:40 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2162637 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#105 |
#104 | |
| I'll VOTE One thing, if I get eaten tonight, it would be my guess I correctly identified at least one wolf in my "dogpile" observation. | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 01:03:14 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2162893 | Parent:#104 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#105 | |
| I have a #2 choice, so I'll change if you or another can convince me of your innocence, | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 01:53:11 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2163149 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#107 |
#106 | |
| My mind is kind of in a jumble right now. I was thinking that because of the way he was acting that Tonight I think I'll VOTE | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 01:54:41 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2163405 | Parent:#106 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#107 | |
| damn it... VOTE cheesiekitty | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 03:45:27 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2163661 | Parent:#97 Siblings:#112 Children:#110 |
#108 | |
| Ok- as someone who has both played many times before, and played with me many times before, you should know that I know better than that. I made a vote, based on gut feeling, like I did with Daedalus, but today instead of being ignored, a couple of people followed me. That's all. I switched because I think my vote brought out some interesting comments by several people. And I have stated that I've been suspicious of you in past posts. | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 03:52:07 GMT Author: Subject:For what it's worth Link:144077#2163917 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#117 #121 |
#109 | |
| I'm a villager! I am not a wolf or the sorcerer! I am going to Sedona tomorrow- so I'm not sure if I'll be able to post again before you lynch me. I am a villager. I'm skipping the whole "wine in front of me thing", it's been done. Here is my list of wolfy suspects as of now (in no particular order): H&H Dadealus I'm sure at least two are wolves. But I can't be sure of which. If I am lynched tomorrow- I wish all the best for the town, and for god's sake- HANG A WOLF TOMORROW! | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 04:02:21 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2164173 | Parent:#108 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#110 | |
| your suspicion of me makes me suspicious of you :P well, the statement that i wasn't playing like myself does, anyway, especially with no follow-up details. But frankly, I'm stumped, and that's the best I have to go on right now. | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 04:11:06 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2164429 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:(none) |
#111 | |
| There's entirely too much to consider at this point and not enough really hard evidence to point a finger at anyone. That said VOTE I | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 04:29:28 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2164685 | Parent:#97 Siblings:#108 Children:#115 #116 |
#112 | |
| What change of playstyle? This game is quite unique in all that I've played in that two of the three good specials got nuked pretty quickly, and we're still hunting for all four wolves. At this point, I'm not feeling that great being a villager right now. And even if the seer scores a hit, s/he can only get one wolf taken out before dying. With pretty-much NO CLUE who might be a wolf, I'm honestly shooting in the dark, so to speak. | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 04:47:28 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2164941 | Parent:#61 Siblings:#98 Children:#114 |
#113 | |
| Or could it be a new legend: The gorillashamen Gambit? Hmmm, I could see you trying that. Haven't seen anything else really suspicious, so what the hell... vote gorillashamen. | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 04:56:03 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2165197 | Parent:#113 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#114 | |
| You really should aim that vote somewhere else, it's dangerous. Here, if it makes you happy, I'll prove we can't all three be wolves. unvote vote | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 05:00:38 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2165453 | Parent:#112 Siblings:#116 Children:(none) |
#115 | |
| That's not necessarily true. CASE 1: SEER gets lynched. Hopefully a SEER in this position will be smart enough to reveal everything they've seen in the moments before their death (i.e. reveal by 10:50 AM you fool!) CASE 2: SEER gets eaten. Hopefully a SEER in this position has left some sort of clues behind. If not we're toast. | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 05:09:51 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2165709 | Parent:#112 Siblings:#115 Children:(none) |
#116 | |
| wtf is wrong with me... I meant | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 06:03:49 GMT Author: Subject:Re: For what it's worth Link:144077#2165965 | Parent:#109 Siblings:#121 Children:(none) |
#117 | |
| Hey, I'm the one that said I didn't think you were necessarily a wolf. But you even admitted that some of the choices you've made this game could be perceived as suspicious, and I still haven't voted. | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 06:14:43 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2166477 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #120 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:#119 |
#118 | |
| I still don't think Chessie is a wolf, though she's made some strange votes. I still think that either I still think | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 06:15:13 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2166733 | Parent:#118 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#119 | |
| for clarification: vote | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 09:00:09 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2166989 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #123 #125 #128 #135 Children:(none) |
#120 | |
| Just to be sure I don't get killed for inactivity, I | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 13:54:33 GMT Author: Subject:Re: For what it's worth Link:144077#2167501 | Parent:#109 Siblings:#117 Children:#122 #124 #126 |
#121 | |
| At this point, given 17 players, 4 wolves, and the assumption that you are not a wolf. If you were to choose 6 people at random... 1-(12C6/16C6) = 1-924/8008 = 88% I'm 88% certain at least one of those would be a wolf. 12C5*4C1/16C6 = 792*4/8008 = 39% I'm 39% certain EXACTLY one of those would be a wolf. 12C4*4C2/16C6 = 495*6/8008 = 37% I'm 37% certain EXACTLY two of those would be a wolf. What makes your guesses any better than pure chance? | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 15:02:24 GMT Author: Subject:Re: For what it's worth Link:144077#2167757 | Parent:#121 Siblings:#124 #126 Children:(none) |
#122 | |
| huh?? :P | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 15:22:44 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2168013 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #125 #128 #135 Children:(none) |
#123 | |
| Ok, so that I explain my absence, I'm traveling down to the San Luis Obispo Renaissance Faire and I'll be leaving in about two hours. I vote *raises a glass* Here's to hoping I don't wake up dead. Oh, and BTW, if I do, Cthulhu will come in the night and do horrible things to your sleeping body. | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 15:42:03 GMT Author: Subject:Re: For what it's worth Link:144077#2168269 | Parent:#121 Siblings:#122 #126 Children:(none) |
#124 | |
| Now there's the | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 17:02:27 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2169037 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #128 #135 Children:(none) |
#125 | |
| I still find myself uncharacteristically stumped. I solicit any avenues for thought on this one. | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 17:16:08 GMT Author: Subject:Re: For what it's worth Link:144077#2169293 | Parent:#121 Siblings:#122 #124 Children:#127 |
#126 | |
| *sniff* I missed the magic math posts | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 17:24:25 GMT Author: Subject:Re: For what it's worth Link:144077#2169805 | Parent:#126 Siblings:(none) Children:#132 |
#127 | |
| They're generally useless, and tended to get me lynched. That and I wind up giving lessons in basic probability. | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 17:27:11 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2170061 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #135 Children:#129 #130 #131 |
#128 | |
| Is it just me, or everyday in Millers Hollow like Day 1 this time around? So, with the little info that I have, I vote | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 17:28:24 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2170317 | Parent:#128 Siblings:#130 #131 Children:(none) |
#129 | |
| Ack. Sorry for the rambling bold again. :\ | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 17:36:19 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2171597 | Parent:#128 Siblings:#129 #131 Children:#134 |
#130 | |
| With a severe lack of anything to go on, yes, every day is like day 1. I suspect the wolves are, indeed, running a play of eating mundane choices and, I hate to say, it's working. | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 17:37:51 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2172109 | Parent:#128 Siblings:#129 #130 Children:#133 |
#131 | |
| What can I say to convince you that that is really not a good idea? | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 17:44:25 GMT Author: Subject:Re: For what it's worth Link:144077#2172877 | Parent:#127 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#132 | |
| No lessons. It's basically probable that math posts will get you lynched ;-) | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 17:45:03 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2173133 | Parent:#131 Siblings:(none) Children:#136 |
#133 | |
| Got another choice? Blind me with statistics! | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 17:46:56 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2173389 | Parent:#130 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#134 | |
| Whether it's crafty vets, or just new people who don't know who is traditionally considered dangerous, this strategy is pretty effective - especially with the loss of the Witch and the Hunter keeping specials from coming out. | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 17:50:00 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2173645 | Parent:(none) Siblings:#1 #2 #3 #4 #8 #11 #12 #13 #24 #29 #33 #37 #40 #50 #53 #57 #58 #69 #83 #85 #93 #96 #97 #104 #106 #109 #111 #118 #120 #123 #125 #128 Children:(none) |
#135 | |
| Where is that cricket guy when we need him? FYI villagers: People often site voting for someone to be suspicious (as I did in my previous post). The fact is everyone is going to vote badly at times (even the wolves). On a related note, I hope the seer can leak some information before they are eaten (without resulting in such). | |||
| Time:2007-07-20 17:51:08 GMT Author: Subject:(none) Link:144077#2173901 | Parent:#133 Siblings:(none) Children:(none) |
#136 | |
| My original vote was for | |||
| vote | 2007-07-19 19:03:46 GMT | #8 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-19 19:19:25 GMT | #11 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-19 20:09:11 GMT | #31 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-19 20:46:13 GMT | #40 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-19 21:04:18 GMT | #46 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-19 21:05:00 GMT | #48 | |||
| unvote | 2007-07-19 21:26:57 GMT | #56 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-19 21:33:49 GMT | #60 | |||
| unvote | 2007-07-19 21:38:28 GMT | #62 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-19 21:38:28 GMT | #62 | |||
| unvote | 2007-07-19 21:49:11 GMT | #69 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-19 21:55:39 GMT | #76 | |||
| unvote | 2007-07-19 22:02:46 GMT | #85 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-19 22:52:51 GMT | #97 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-19 23:59:45 GMT | #103 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-20 00:58:40 GMT | #104 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-20 01:53:11 GMT | #106 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-20 01:54:41 GMT | #107 | cheesiekitty | ||
| vote | 2007-07-20 04:11:06 GMT | #111 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-20 04:47:28 GMT | #113 | gorillashamen | ||
| unvote | 2007-07-20 04:56:03 GMT | #114 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-20 04:56:03 GMT | #114 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-20 06:14:43 GMT | #118 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-20 06:15:13 GMT | #119 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-20 09:00:09 GMT | #120 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-20 15:22:44 GMT | #123 | |||
| vote | 2007-07-20 17:27:11 GMT | #128 |
| 5 against | : | ||
| 4 against | : | ||
| 3 against | : | ||
| 2 against | : | ||
| 2 against | : | ||
| Posted but no vote | : | ||
| posts by | : | (22) | #7 #8 #9 #10 #12 #17 #18 #19 #21 #25 #26 #28 #29 #30 #62 #63 #71 #74 #78 #88 #91 #100 | |
| posts by | : | (19) | #1 #3 #6 #14 #15 #20 #27 #64 #65 #66 #67 #83 #95 #96 #97 #110 #116 #124 #134 | |
| posts by | : | (16) | #23 #24 #33 #40 #43 #44 #69 #72 #75 #77 #84 #90 #92 #93 #108 #109 | |
| posts by | : | (15) | #31 #39 #42 #55 #56 #57 #68 #76 #81 #85 #87 #94 #99 #102 #103 | |
| posts by | : | (13) | #35 #38 #46 #61 #86 #89 #101 #114 #115 #121 #127 #131 #136 | |
| posts by | : | (9) | #4 #41 #51 #58 #59 #80 #117 #118 #119 | |
| posts by | : | (8) | #13 #16 #34 #36 #126 #128 #129 #133 | |
| posts by | : | (8) | #32 #37 #49 #50 #53 #98 #104 #105 | |
| posts by | : | (7) | #2 #47 #48 #112 #125 #130 #132 | |
| posts by | : | (6) | #5 #22 #45 #52 #54 #123 | |
| posts by | : | (5) | #60 #70 #73 #79 #82 | |
| posts by | : | (3) | #106 #107 #122 | |
| posts by | : | (2) | #11 #135 | |
| posts by | : | (1) | #111 | |
| posts by | : | (1) | #113 | |
| posts by | : | (1) | #120 |